Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Woodrow Wilson Morris v. Rick Jackson Lynn Phillips Franklin Freeman, 86 F.3d 1151, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Woodrow Wilson Morris in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 86 F.3d 1151 Docket: 95-8571

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Woodrow Wilson Morris in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Woodrow Wilson Morris v. Rick Jackson Lynn Phillips Franklin Freeman, 86 F.3d 1151, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Woodrow Wilson Morris in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    86 F.

    3d 1151

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Woodrow Wilson MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Rick JACKSON; Lynn Phillips; Franklin Freeman,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-8571.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted May 16, 1996.
    Decided June 3, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95440-3-MU)
    Woodrow Wilson Morris, Appellant Pro Se.
    W.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Morris v. Jackson, No. CA-95-440-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec.
    1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like