Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Raymer v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Raymer's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors in the lower court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court denied Raymer's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Raymer v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Raymer's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors in the lower court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court denied Raymer's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6331

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Raymer's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors in the lower court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court denied Raymer's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Raymer v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Raymer's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors in the lower court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court denied Raymer's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6331

    GREGORY L. RAYMER, SR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; CITY OF RICHMOND, Circuit
    Court et al,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-00-2017-AM)

    Submitted:

    April 12, 2001

    Decided:

    April 23, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Gregory L. Raymer, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory L. Raymer, Sr., seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    According-

    ly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal


    on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Raymer v. Angelone,

    No. CA-00-2017-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like