Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Conde, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Sidike Conde of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and subsequent motion for reconsideration. The appellate court conducted a review of the district court record and found no reversible errors in the rulings. The appeal is dismissed on the basis of the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying the § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-06-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6624

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Sidike Conde of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and subsequent motion for reconsideration. The appellate court conducted a review of the district court record and found no reversible errors in the rulings. The appeal is dismissed on the basis of the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying the § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Conde, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Sidike Conde of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and subsequent motion for reconsideration. The appellate court conducted a review of the district court record and found no reversible errors in the rulings. The appeal is dismissed on the basis of the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying the § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6624

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SIDIKE CONDE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR99-262-S, CA-01-830-S)

    Submitted:

    May 31, 2001

    Decided:

    June 11, 2001

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Sidike Conde, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Eisenburg, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sidike Conde seeks to appeal the district courts orders
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2000)
    and his motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts orders and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    United States v.

    Conde, Nos. CR-99-262-S; CA-01-830-S (D. Md. filed March 19, 2001,
    entered March 20, 2001; filed March 30, 2001, entered April 2,
    2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like