Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    McLean v. Bohannon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Cleveland McLean Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court also denied McLean's motion for attorney's fees and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    McLean v. Bohannon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Cleveland McLean Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court also denied McLean's motion for attorney's fees and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6997

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Cleveland McLean Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court also denied McLean's motion for attorney's fees and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    McLean v. Bohannon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Cleveland McLean Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court also denied McLean's motion for attorney's fees and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6997

    CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBERT BOHANNON, Bohannon, Bohannon & Hancock,
    Attorneys at Law; JAMES O. BROCCOLETTI, Zoby &
    Broccoletti, Attorneys at Law,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (CA-03-336-2)

    Submitted:

    October 15, 2003

    Decided:

    March 16, 2004

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Cleveland McLean, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    on the reasoning of the district court.

    See McLean v. Bohannon,

    No. CA-03-336-2 (E.D. Va. May 21, 2003).

    We deny McLeans motion

    for attorneys fees.


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like