Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Roy Everett Bruce v. David W. Chester Attorney General of The State of North Carlina, Respondent, 818 F.2d 28, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. It therefore denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Roy Everett Bruce v. David W. Chester Attorney General of The State of North Carlina, Respondent, 818 F.2d 28, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. It therefore denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 818 F.2d 28 Docket: 86-6815

    Original Title

    Roy Everett Bruce v. David W. Chester Attorney General of the State of North Carlina, Respondent, 818 F.2d 28, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. It therefore denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views1 page

    Roy Everett Bruce v. David W. Chester Attorney General of The State of North Carlina, Respondent, 818 F.2d 28, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. It therefore denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    818 F.

    2d 28
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Roy Everett BRUCE, Petitioner--Appellant,
    v.
    David W. CHESTER; Attorney General of the State of North
    Carlina, Respondent-- Appellee.
    No. 86-6815.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 28, 1987.
    Decided April 29, 1987.

    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.


    Roy Everett Bruce, appellant pro se.
    Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North
    Carolina, for appellee.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal
    from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal,
    dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Bruce v. Chester, C/A No. 86-229-A-C (W.D.N.C., Oct. 17,
    1986) .

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like