Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lillie v. Lifetouch National, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to Lifetouch National School Studios in Rhonda Lillie's employment discrimination suit. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-02-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1460

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to Lifetouch National School Studios in Rhonda Lillie's employment discrimination suit. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Lillie v. Lifetouch National, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to Lifetouch National School Studios in Rhonda Lillie's employment discrimination suit. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1460

    RHONDA R. LILLIE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-96-245-2)
    Submitted:

    February 12, 1998

    Decided:

    February 24, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Rhonda R. Lillie, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Edwin Miller, MCGUIRE,
    WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rhonda R. Lillie appeals the district court's order granting
    the Defendant summary judgment on her employment discrimination
    suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lillie v. Lifetouch National School
    Studios, No. CA-96-245-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 1997). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like