Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gillis v. Walsh, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Leon Gillis' civil suit for lack of jurisdiction. The district court found no reversible error after reviewing the record and its opinion. The appellate court also found no error in the district court's reasoning and affirmed its decision to dismiss the case without oral argument, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-2752

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Leon Gillis' civil suit for lack of jurisdiction. The district court found no reversible error after reviewing the record and its opinion. The appellate court also found no error in the district court's reasoning and affirmed its decision to dismiss the case without oral argument, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Gillis v. Walsh, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Leon Gillis' civil suit for lack of jurisdiction. The district court found no reversible error after reviewing the record and its opinion. The appellate court also found no error in the district court's reasoning and affirmed its decision to dismiss the case without oral argument, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-2752

    LEON HILTON GILLIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BUD WALSH, NRV Fairgrounds; DWIGHT FRALIN,
    Dublin Lions Club; WILLARD AKERS, Dublin Lions
    Club,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-98-556-R)

    Submitted:

    February 11, 1999

    Decided:

    February 23, 1999

    Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Leon Hilton Gillis, Appellant Pro Se. Lori Elizabeth Jones, JOHNSON, AYERS & MATTHEWS, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Leon Gillis appeals the district courts order dismissing his
    civil suit for lack of jurisdiction.

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Gillis v. Walsh, No. CA-98-556-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 25, 1998).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like