Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Roger Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts in an age discrimination lawsuit filed by Roger Dean Bandy. The district court had struck portions of Bandy's complaint and found no error in granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts based on the reasoning in its previous orders from November 29, 2012 and March 6, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Roger Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts in an age discrimination lawsuit filed by Roger Dean Bandy. The district court had struck portions of Bandy's complaint and found no error in granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts based on the reasoning in its previous orders from November 29, 2012 and March 6, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-07-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-2512

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts in an age discrimination lawsuit filed by Roger Dean Bandy. The district court had struck portions of Bandy's complaint and found no error in granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts based on the reasoning in its previous orders from November 29, 2012 and March 6, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Roger Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts in an age discrimination lawsuit filed by Roger Dean Bandy. The district court had struck portions of Bandy's complaint and found no error in granting summary judgment to Advance Auto Parts based on the reasoning in its previous orders from November 29, 2012 and March 6, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-2512

    ROGER DEAN BANDY,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    James C. Turk, Senior
    District Judge. (7:11-cv-00365-JCT)

    Submitted:

    July 12, 2013

    Decided:

    July 24, 2013

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Thomas E. Strelka, STRICKLAND, DIVINEY & STRELKA, Roanoke,


    Virginia, for Appellant.
    Agnis C. Chakravorty, Frank K.
    Friedman, WOODS ROGERS, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Roger

    Dean

    Bandy

    appeals

    district

    court

    orders

    striking

    portions of his complaint and granting summary judgment against


    him in his age-discrimination action against Advance Auto Parts,
    Inc.

    See Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 621

    et seq.

    We have reviewed the record and we find no error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.


    See Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 2012 WL 6018741 (W.D. Va.
    Nov.

    29,

    2012);

    Bandy

    v.

    Advance

    831027 (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2012).

    Auto

    Parts,

    Inc.,

    2012

    WL

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like