Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Xuli Zhang v. S. Regan, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Xuli Zhang appealed a magistrate judge's denial of her Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the denial of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two police officers. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the magistrate judge's order denying Zhang's motion. The court also denied Zhang's motion for oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Xuli Zhang v. S. Regan, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Xuli Zhang appealed a magistrate judge's denial of her Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the denial of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two police officers. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the magistrate judge's order denying Zhang's motion. The court also denied Zhang's motion for oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-07-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-1389

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Xuli Zhang appealed a magistrate judge's denial of her Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the denial of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two police officers. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the magistrate judge's order denying Zhang's motion. The court also denied Zhang's motion for oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Xuli Zhang v. S. Regan, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Xuli Zhang appealed a magistrate judge's denial of her Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the denial of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two police officers. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the magistrate judge's order denying Zhang's motion. The court also denied Zhang's motion for oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-1389

    XULI ZHANG,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    POLICE S. REGAN; POLICE PEC. M. GREEN,
    Defendants -

    Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Theresa C. Buchanan,
    Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-01329-TCB)

    Submitted:

    July 10, 2012

    Decided:

    July 18, 2012

    Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Xuli Zhang, Appellant Pro Se.


    Karen L. Gibbons,
    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

    COUNTY

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Xuli
    denying

    her

    Zhang

    Fed.

    appeals

    R.

    Civ.

    P.

    the

    magistrate

    60(b)

    motion

    to

    judges
    set

    order

    aside

    the

    magistrate judges order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. 1983


    (2006) complaint. *
    reversible error.
    order.

    See

    Mar. 20,

    2012).

    dispense

    with

    We have reviewed the record and find no


    Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judges

    Zhang

    v.
    We

    oral

    Regan,
    deny

    No.

    Zhangs

    argument

    1:10-cv-01329-TCB
    motion

    because

    for

    the

    (E.D.

    remand.

    facts

    and

    Va.
    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate


    judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) (2006).

    You might also like