Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. McCall, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Cleveland Lewis Williams, Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its October 27, 2003 order. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments unnecessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-04-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7865

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Cleveland Lewis Williams, Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its October 27, 2003 order. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments unnecessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Williams v. McCall, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Cleveland Lewis Williams, Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its October 27, 2003 order. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments unnecessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7865

    CLEVELAND LEWIS WILLIAMS, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DARNELL MCCALL, Chief of Police Anderson City
    Detention Center; BOBBY GUNNER, Correction
    Officer; ANGELA WHITE, Nurse; ALLEN MCALISTER,
    a/k/a Gofer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
    (CA-01-4275-8-12BI)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 2004

    Decided:

    April 20, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Cleveland Lewis Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick


    Lindemann, Michael Brian Wren, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Cleveland

    Lewis

    Williams,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge


    and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Williams v. McCall, No. CA-01-4275-8-12BI (D.S.C.

    Oct. 27, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like