Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    United States v. Christian, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Christian's motion for modification of his sentence. Christian had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows for modification of a sentence under certain circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court then denied Christian's request for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Christian, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Christian's motion for modification of his sentence. Christian had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows for modification of a sentence under certain circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court then denied Christian's request for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7473

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Christian's motion for modification of his sentence. Christian had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows for modification of a sentence under certain circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court then denied Christian's request for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Christian, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Christian's motion for modification of his sentence. Christian had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows for modification of a sentence under certain circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court then denied Christian's request for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7473

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ANTHONY CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIAN, a/k/a Leroy,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
    District Judge. (CR-91-230-WS)

    Submitted:

    January 21, 1999

    Decided:

    February 9, 1999

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Anthony Christopher Christian, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Christopher Christian appeals the district courts
    order denying his motion for modification of his sentence under 18
    U.S.C.A. 3582(c)(2) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    United States v. Christian, No. CR-91-230-WS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 24,
    1998).

    We deny Christians motion for appointment of counsel and

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like