Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Reed v. Drew, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    Steven Reed filed a Section 1983 complaint against a sheriff and captain alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Reed relief and dismissed the case. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Reed relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7142

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Steven Reed filed a Section 1983 complaint against a sheriff and captain alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Reed relief and dismissed the case. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Reed relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Reed v. Drew, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Reed filed a Section 1983 complaint against a sheriff and captain alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Reed relief and dismissed the case. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Reed relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7142

    STEVEN J. REED,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANK DREW, Sheriff; CAPTAIN WILKIE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-4-3)

    Submitted:

    January 21, 1999

    Decided:

    February 9, 1999

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Steven J. Reed, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven J. Reed appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A.
    1915A (West Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion accepting the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    the reasoning of the district court.
    4-3 (E.D. Va. July 16, 1998).

    Accordingly, we affirm on

    See Reed v. Drew, No. CA-98-

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like