Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Penland v. United States, 4th Cir. (2009)
Penland v. United States, 4th Cir. (2009)
Penland v. United States, 4th Cir. (2009)
No. 08-2326
MARY PENLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (6:07-cv-03977-HMH)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Mary
dismissing
Penland
her
civil
appeals
action
the
district
against
the
courts
United
order
States.
The
28
U.S.C.
636(b)(1)(B)
(2006).
The
magistrate
judge
that
failure
to
file
specific
objections
to
this
based
specifically
upon
the
object
recommendation.
to
the
Penland
dispositive
did
not
of
the
portion
recommendation.
The
magistrate
timely
judges
filing
of
recommendation
specific
is
objections
necessary
to
to
preserve
parties
noncompliance.
have
been
warned
of
the
consequences
of
(4th Cir. 2007); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Penland has waived appellate review by failing to file specific
objections
after
receiving
proper
notice.
Accordingly,
we
Further, we deny
contentions
are
adequately
2
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED