Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Dais V., 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Norman Tyrone Dais filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his motion to compel. The court of appeals found no undue delay by the district court. While granting Dais leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and that oral argument was not necessary. The petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act was denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-2330

    Original Title

    In Re: Dais v., 4th Cir. (2009)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Norman Tyrone Dais filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his motion to compel. The court of appeals found no undue delay by the district court. While granting Dais leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and that oral argument was not necessary. The petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act was denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    In Re: Dais V., 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Norman Tyrone Dais filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his motion to compel. The court of appeals found no undue delay by the district court. While granting Dais leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and that oral argument was not necessary. The petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act was denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-2330

    In Re:

    NORMAN TYRONE DAIS,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (4:03-cr-386-TLW)

    Submitted:

    March 17, 2009

    Decided:

    March 19, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Norman Tyrone Dais, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Norman Tyrone Dais petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
    motion to compel.

    He seeks an order from this court directing

    the district court to act.

    We find there has been no undue

    delay in the district court.


    leave

    to

    petition.
    legal
    before

    proceed

    forma

    pauperis,

    we

    deny

    the

    mandamus

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    in

    Accordingly, although we grant

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like