Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Robinson V., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Gary Robinson's petition for a writ of mandamus in which he alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his post-conviction motions. While allowing Robinson to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court found no undue delay by the district court and denied the petition, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for decision without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-4613

    Original Title

    In Re: Robinson v., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Gary Robinson's petition for a writ of mandamus in which he alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his post-conviction motions. While allowing Robinson to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court found no undue delay by the district court and denied the petition, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for decision without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    In Re: Robinson V., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Gary Robinson's petition for a writ of mandamus in which he alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his post-conviction motions. While allowing Robinson to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court found no undue delay by the district court and denied the petition, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented for decision without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-4613

    In Re:

    GARY ROBINSON,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-02-253-WMN)

    Submitted:

    September 8, 2004

    Decided:

    October 22, 2004

    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gary Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Gary Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging
    the district court has unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment
    of conviction motions. He seeks an order from this court directing
    the district court to act.
    in the district court.

    We find there has been no undue delay

    Accordingly, although we grant Robinson

    leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for writ


    of mandamus.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like