Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wilson v. Prison Health Service, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Eddie C. Wilson, Sr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-04-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7722

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Eddie C. Wilson, Sr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Wilson v. Prison Health Service, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Eddie C. Wilson, Sr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7722

    EDDIE C. WILSON, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INCORPORATED; BALTIMORE
    CITY DETENTION CENTER; BALTIMORE CITY BOOKING
    & INTAKE CENTER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-03-472-8-AW)

    Submitted:

    March 23, 2005

    Decided:

    April 12, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eddie C. Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Joseph Crawford,


    ALDELMAN, SHEFF & SMITH, Rockville, Maryland; John Joseph Curran,
    Jr., Attorney General, Glenn Todd Marrow, Assistant Attorney
    General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Eddie C. Wilson, Sr. appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Wilson v.

    Prison Health Servs., Inc., No. CA-03-472-8-AW (D. Md. Oct. 12,
    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like