Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Yarborough v. Lofton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Danny Lamont Yarborough under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Yarborough and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6145

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Danny Lamont Yarborough under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Yarborough and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views3 pages

    Yarborough v. Lofton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Danny Lamont Yarborough under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Yarborough and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6145

    DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    DELWIN EARL HARRIS,
    Plaintiff,
    versus
    JOSEPH LOFTON; S. D. STEWART; JOHNNIE LEE, and
    Medical Staff; LYNN PHILLIPS; FINESSE G.
    COUCH, and staff; WILLIAM JENNETTE; OFFICER
    LANCASTER; C. P. HINES; GLEN BRITT; TED
    FERELL; VZZELL; IDA REANEY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District
    Judge. (CA-95-761-5-CT-BR)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 5, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Yarborough v. Lofton, No. CA-95-761-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov.
    2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like