Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hoffman v. Hoffman, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Barbara Hoffman's complaint. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-2814

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Barbara Hoffman's complaint. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views3 pages

    Hoffman v. Hoffman, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Barbara Hoffman's complaint. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-2814

    BARBARA HOFFMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL HOFFMAN; JOSEPH ROUSE; STATE OF MARYLAND; ASSIGNMENT OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT, ANNE
    ARUNDEL COUNTY; KERRY ANDERSON; DAVID BOWERS;
    GALE ANN BELUCCI; RICHARD BACHARACH, M.D.;
    DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; GINGER HOWARD;
    INGRID HOFFMAN; SUE HOUSER; PAM ZIOLKOWSKI;
    BERNIE DIVVER; EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; TRACEY AGNEW;
    KRYSTLE HOFFMAN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-963541-AMD)
    Submitted:

    March 13, 1997

    Decided:

    March 18, 1997

    Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Barbara Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her
    complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (1994), as amended by
    Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110
    Stat. 1321. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Hoffman v. Hoffman, No. CA-963541-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like