Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Reavis, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Sandra Reavis appealed the district court's denial of her motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Reavis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-04-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6013

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sandra Reavis appealed the district court's denial of her motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Reavis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Reavis, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sandra Reavis appealed the district court's denial of her motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Reavis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6013

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SANDRA REAVIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CR-92-68, CA-97-139)
    Submitted:

    March 24, 1998

    Decided: April 3, 1998

    Before ERVIN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Sandra Reavis, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Crawford Vick, Jr., OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant Sandra Reavis seeks to appeal the district court's
    order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. United States v. Reavis, No. CR-92-68; No.
    CA-97-139 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like