Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Gutierrez, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals also denied Gutierrez's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Gutierrez, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals also denied Gutierrez's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-04-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8497

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals also denied Gutierrez's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Gutierrez, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals also denied Gutierrez's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8497

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOSE GUTIERREZ, a/k/a Pappy, a/k/a Cuban,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (1:91-cr-00189-CMC-1)

    Submitted:

    April 16, 2009

    Decided:

    April 24, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jose Gutierrez, Appellant Pro Se.


    Robert Claude Jendron, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jose

    Gutierrez

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for reconsideration of its previous order


    denying

    his

    motion

    for

    reduction

    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).


    no reversible error.

    States v.

    Dunphy,

    sentence

    pursuant

    to

    18

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.


    1:91-cr-00189-CMC-1

    of

    (D.S.C.
    551

    F.3d

    United States v. Gutierrez, No.


    Nov.
    247

    24,
    (4th

    2008).
    Cir.

    See

    2009).

    United
    We

    deny

    Gutierrezs motion for appointment of counsel.

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like