Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    McAfee v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Philip McAfee of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The three-judge panel reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. The panel then denied McAfee's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its January 14, 2000 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    McAfee v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Philip McAfee of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The three-judge panel reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. The panel then denied McAfee's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its January 14, 2000 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-05-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6203

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Philip McAfee of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The three-judge panel reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. The panel then denied McAfee's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its January 14, 2000 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    McAfee v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Philip McAfee of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The three-judge panel reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. The panel then denied McAfee's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its January 14, 2000 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6203

    PHILIP EDWARD MCAFEE, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-99-571-7)

    Submitted:

    May 11, 2000

    Decided:

    May 18, 2000

    Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Philip Edward McAfee, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson,
    III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Philip McAfee appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district court's

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a cer-

    tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning


    of the district court.
    (W.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2000).

    See McAfee v. Angelone, No. CA-99-571-7


    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like