Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Brooks v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Earl Brooks filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Brooks appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Brooks v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Robert Earl Brooks filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Brooks appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7417

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Earl Brooks filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Brooks appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Brooks v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Earl Brooks filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Brooks appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7417

    ROBERT EARL BROOKS,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-94-569-5-BR)
    Submitted:

    January 23, 1996

    Decided:

    February 9, 1996

    Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert Earl Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Brooks v. Freeman, No. CA-94-569-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like