Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Barnes v. Gilmore, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Aaron Lamont Barnes. The court had reviewed Barnes' motion filed under Rule 60(b) in the district court and found no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Barnes v. Gilmore, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Aaron Lamont Barnes. The court had reviewed Barnes' motion filed under Rule 60(b) in the district court and found no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7502

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Aaron Lamont Barnes. The court had reviewed Barnes' motion filed under Rule 60(b) in the district court and found no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Barnes v. Gilmore, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Aaron Lamont Barnes. The court had reviewed Barnes' motion filed under Rule 60(b) in the district court and found no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7502

    AARON LAMONT BARNES,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES S. GILMORE, III,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-703-AM)

    Submitted:

    March 22, 2001

    Decided:

    March 28, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Aaron Lamont Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Aaron Lamont Barnes seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the


    reasoning of the district court. Barnes v. Gilmore, No. CA-98-703AM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 2, 2000; entered Oct. 4, 2000).

    We dis-

    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like