Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Armstrong v. City of Greensboro, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two consolidated appeals by Arthur Armstrong of orders by a magistrate judge. The magistrate judge denied Armstrong's motion to reopen a case and for summary judgment, as well as his motion to proceed with the appeals in forma pauperis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate's rulings. It therefore denied Armstrong's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the appeals as frivolous, and also denied Armstrong's motions for summary judgment in one of the cases.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Armstrong v. City of Greensboro, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views3 pages
    This document summarizes two consolidated appeals by Arthur Armstrong of orders by a magistrate judge. The magistrate judge denied Armstrong's motion to reopen a case and for summary judgment, as well as his motion to proceed with the appeals in forma pauperis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate's rulings. It therefore denied Armstrong's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the appeals as frivolous, and also denied Armstrong's motions for summary judgment in one of the cases.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1500

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes two consolidated appeals by Arthur Armstrong of orders by a magistrate judge. The magistrate judge denied Armstrong's motion to reopen a case and for summary judgment, as well as his motion to proceed with the appeals in forma pauperis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate's rulings. It therefore denied Armstrong's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the appeals as frivolous, and also denied Armstrong's motions for summary judgment in one of the cases.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views3 pages

    Armstrong v. City of Greensboro, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two consolidated appeals by Arthur Armstrong of orders by a magistrate judge. The magistrate judge denied Armstrong's motion to reopen a case and for summary judgment, as well as his motion to proceed with the appeals in forma pauperis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate's rulings. It therefore denied Armstrong's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the appeals as frivolous, and also denied Armstrong's motions for summary judgment in one of the cases.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1500

    ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF GREENSBORO; OFFICER WATSON; OFFICER
    COOK,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 01-1655

    ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF GREENSBORO; OFFICER WATSON; OFFICER
    COOK,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-855-2)

    Submitted:

    January 10, 2002

    Decided:

    January 18, 2002

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Thompson Wright,
    Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals a
    magistrate judges orders denying leave to reopen a case and for
    summary judgment and denying a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.*

    We have reviewed the record and the mag-

    istrate judges orders and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we deny Armstrongs motions for leave to proceed on appeal in forma


    pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous upon the reasoning of
    the magistrate judge. See Armstrong v. City of Greensboro, No. CA96-855-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2001 & Apr. 30, 2001).

    We also deny

    Armstrongs motions for summary judgment filed in No. 01-1500.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate


    judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) (2001).
    3

    You might also like