Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Davis v. Ohar, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Richard E. Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the head of medical services at his prison. The district court denied relief and Davis appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Davis' motion for appointment of counsel. The court concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-02-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7432

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard E. Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the head of medical services at his prison. The district court denied relief and Davis appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Davis' motion for appointment of counsel. The court concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Davis v. Ohar, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard E. Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the head of medical services at his prison. The district court denied relief and Davis appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Davis' motion for appointment of counsel. The court concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7432

    RICHARD E. DAVIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR OHAR, Head of Medical
    Greensville Correctional Center,

    Services,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-524-CMH-BRP)

    Submitted: January 26, 2006

    Decided: February 2, 2006

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Richard E. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard E. Davis appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Davis v.

    Ohar, No. CA-05-524-CMH-BRP (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2005).

    Davis

    motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like