Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bonner v. Rivera, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of William Lamar Bonner's Rule 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6567

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of William Lamar Bonner's Rule 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Bonner v. Rivera, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of William Lamar Bonner's Rule 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6567

    WILLIAM LAMAR BONNER, a/k/a William Bonner,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    M. L. RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (8:07-cv-01498-GRA)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 2009

    Decided:

    August 5, 2009

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Lamar Bonner, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William Lamar Bonner, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on Bonners Fed. R. Civ.
    P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the denial of his 28
    U.S.C. 2241 (2006) petition.
    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    for

    the

    Bonner v. Rivera, No.

    8:07-cv-01498-GRA, (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2009).


    oral

    affirm

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like