Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Mitchell, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Clinton Mitchell III's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Mitchell appealed the district court's order denying his motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 2009 ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7990

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Clinton Mitchell III's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Mitchell appealed the district court's order denying his motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 2009 ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    United States v. Mitchell, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Clinton Mitchell III's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Mitchell appealed the district court's order denying his motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 2009 ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7990

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CLINTON MITCHELL, III,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
    W. Earl Britt,
    Senior District Judge. (7:97-cr-00057-BR-1)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2009

    Decided:

    December 31, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Clinton Mitchell, III, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Clinton
    order

    denying

    Mitchell,

    his

    motion

    III,
    for

    appeals

    reduction

    the
    of

    district
    sentence

    courts
    under

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    See United States v.

    Mitchell, No. 7:97-cr-00057-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 14, 2009 &


    entered Oct. 15, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like