Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Maurice Bynum, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Bynum's motion to reduce his sentence. Bynum appealed the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7671

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Bynum's motion to reduce his sentence. Bynum appealed the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Maurice Bynum, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Bynum's motion to reduce his sentence. Bynum appealed the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7671

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MAURICE BYNUM, a/k/a Dog Boy,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (3:09-cr-00826-CMC-17)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2012

    Decided:

    April 3, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Maurice Bynum, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stacey Denise Haynes, Robert
    Claude Jendron, Jr., Mark C. Moore, Stanley Duane Ragsdale,
    Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Maurice

    Bynum

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his


    sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.
    17

    (D.S.C.

    Nov.

    United States v. Bynum, No. 3:09-cr-00826-CMC8,

    2011).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like