Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hill, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Julius William Hill, Jr. seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit thus denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6650

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Julius William Hill, Jr. seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit thus denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Hill, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Julius William Hill, Jr. seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit thus denies a certificate of appealability and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6650

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JULIUS WILLIAM HILL, JR., a/k/a Butch Hill,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-92-83-S, CR-92-84-S, CA-97-489-4)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 1998

    Decided:

    October 15, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Julius William Hill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Julius William Hill, Jr., seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Hill, Nos. CR-92-83-S; CR-92-84-S; CA-97489-4 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like