Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Griffith v. Bird, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joseph Michael Griffith appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against S. A. Bird and Betty Brown. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-02-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8093

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joseph Michael Griffith appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against S. A. Bird and Betty Brown. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Griffith v. Bird, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joseph Michael Griffith appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against S. A. Bird and Betty Brown. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8093

    JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    S. A. BIRD; BETTY BROWN,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    RICH JACKSON; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00308-GCM)

    Submitted:

    January 12, 2011

    Decided:

    February 8, 2011

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joseph Michael Griffith, Appellant Pro Se.


    Yvonne Bulluck
    Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Griffith

    Nov. 3, 2009).

    v.

    Bird,

    No.

    3:06-cv-00308-GCM

    (W.D.N.C.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like