Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crouch, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Gary Crouch appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7975

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gary Crouch appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Crouch, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gary Crouch appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7975

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GARY C. CROUCH,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR91-397, CA-94-3237-3-19BC, CR-91-310)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 30, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gary C. Crouch, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
    Crouch, Nos. CR-91-397; CR-91-310; CA-94-3237-3-19BC (D.S.C. Oct.
    27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like