Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Crudup v. Seay, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Sylvester Crudup filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and administrators which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 2) Crudup appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Crudup's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's denial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Crudup v. Seay, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    1) Sylvester Crudup filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and administrators which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 2) Crudup appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Crudup's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's denial.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7757

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Sylvester Crudup filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and administrators which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 2) Crudup appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Crudup's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's denial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Crudup v. Seay, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Sylvester Crudup filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and administrators which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 2) Crudup appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Crudup's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's denial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7757

    SYLVESTER CRUDUP,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARCIA
    SEAY,
    Grievance
    Coordinator/
    Institutional Ombudsman; S. HUGHES, Grievance,
    Institutional Ombudsman; L. B. COLLINS, Inmate
    Hearing
    Officer;
    K.
    ORIE,
    Correctional
    Officer; W. BEST, Lieutenant, Correctional
    Officer; A. NETHERLAND, Captain, Correctional
    Officer; A. S. SCOTT, Captain, Correctional
    Officer; J. KEITT, Captain, Correctional
    Officer; L. BOOKER, Correctional Officer; S.
    MOORE, Sergeant, Correctional Officer; A. L.
    JOHNSON, Captain, Correctional Officer; W.
    PENN, Correctional Officer; SUSAN CARSON,
    Operations Officer; C. C. MURPHY, Assistant
    Warden of Operations; ALTON BASKERVILLE,
    Warden; W. P. ROGER, Regional Director; P. M.
    HENICK, Regional Ombudsman,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-02-755-2)

    Submitted:

    February 20, 2003

    Decided:

    February 26, 2003

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sylvester Crudup, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sylvester Crudup appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find that this

    appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

    reasoning of the district court.

    See Crudup v. Seay, No. CA-02-

    755-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like