Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Howell, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Kevin Howell appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Howell, Nos. CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1997).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-08-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6364

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Kevin Howell appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Howell, Nos. CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1997).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Howell, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Kevin Howell appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Howell, Nos. CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1997).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6364

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KEVIN HOWELL, a/k/a William Anthony Johnson,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2)
    Submitted:

    July 24, 1997

    Decided:

    August 6, 1997

    Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kevin Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994) (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    United States v. Howell, Nos. CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar.
    5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like