Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wassil v. Schneider, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Wassil's petition for a writ of mandamus. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which denied the petition, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-06-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1325

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Wassil's petition for a writ of mandamus. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which denied the petition, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Wassil v. Schneider, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Wassil's petition for a writ of mandamus. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which denied the petition, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1325

    JOSEPH D. WASSIL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, Judge, individually and in
    his official capacity; ELLEN M. HELLER, Judge,
    individually and in her official capacity; B.
    GEORGE BALLMAN, Trustee; JOEL P. GOLDBERGER,
    Trustee; GLORIA ALLENDER, Commissioner; JIMMIE
    L. FOXWORTH, Commissioner; FRANK M. CONAWAY,
    Clerk; JAMES PIPER, Realtor; P. WESLEY FOSTER,
    JR., Realtor; WESLEY P. HAIRSTON, Realtor; BOB
    THOMAS, Defendant Pipers Agent; NICHOLAS J.
    DELPIZZO, III, Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01338-L)

    Submitted:

    May 31, 2001

    Decided:

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Joseph D. Wassil, Appellant Pro Se.

    June 8, 2001

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph D. Wassil appeals from the district courts order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Our review of the record

    and the district courts opinion discloses no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Wassil v. Schneider, No. CA-01-338-L (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2001).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like