Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Shafer v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Phillip Mark Shafer appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated. The court also denied Shafer's request for oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Shafer v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Phillip Mark Shafer appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated. The court also denied Shafer's request for oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-02-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7384

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Phillip Mark Shafer appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated. The court also denied Shafer's request for oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Shafer v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Phillip Mark Shafer appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated. The court also denied Shafer's request for oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7384

    PHILLIP MARK SHAFER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.
    (8:07-cv-02088-PJM)

    Submitted:

    January 22, 2008

    Decided:

    February 29, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district courts order
    denying his petition for a writ of mandamus.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shafers


    motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated
    by

    the

    district

    court.

    See

    Shafer

    v.

    Maryland,

    No.

    8:07-cv-02088-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 23, 2007 & entered Aug. 24,
    2007). We also deny Shafers request for oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like