Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James Rodney Smith v. Southern Correctional Institution Cumberland County Sheriff's Department, 73 F.3d 358, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    James Rodney Smith filed a Section 1983 complaint against Southern Correctional Institution and Cumberland County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-04 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 73 F.3d 358 Docket: 95-6994

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Rodney Smith filed a Section 1983 complaint against Southern Correctional Institution and Cumberland County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views1 page

    James Rodney Smith v. Southern Correctional Institution Cumberland County Sheriff's Department, 73 F.3d 358, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Rodney Smith filed a Section 1983 complaint against Southern Correctional Institution and Cumberland County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    73 F.

    3d 358
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    James Rodney SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; Cumberland
    County
    Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6994.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 14, 1995.
    Decided: Jan. 4, 1996.

    James Rodney Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Southern Correctional Inst., No. CA95-247-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like