Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Duhaney, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Garfield Duhaney's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court denied Duhaney's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7756

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Garfield Duhaney's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court denied Duhaney's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Duhaney, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Garfield Duhaney's motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court denied Duhaney's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7756

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GARFIELD AUGUSTINE DUHANEY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR97-92-S, CA-98-3122-S)

    Submitted:

    May 25, 1999

    Decided:

    June 1, 1999

    Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Garfield Augustine Duhaney, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Garfield A. Duhaney appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. 3582(c) (West
    1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we af-

    firm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v.

    Duhaney, Nos. CR-97-92-S; CA-98-3122-S (D. Md. Sept. 15, 1998). We


    deny Duhaneys motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like