Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    James H. Reid v. E.C. Morris R.M. Muncy James E. Johnson B.W. Soles C. Manrique, 838 F.2d 467, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by James H. Reid against several defendants. In less than 3 sentences, the court finds that Reid's appeal is without merit, that the dispositive issues have been decided in previous authoritative decisions, and affirms the judgment of the district court which denied Reid relief in the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    James H. Reid v. E.C. Morris R.M. Muncy James E. Johnson B.W. Soles C. Manrique, 838 F.2d 467, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by James H. Reid against several defendants. In less than 3 sentences, the court finds that Reid's appeal is without merit, that the dispositive issues have been decided in previous authoritative decisions, and affirms the judgment of the district court which denied Reid relief in the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-01-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 838 F.2d 467 Docket: 87-6092

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by James H. Reid against several defendants. In less than 3 sentences, the court finds that Reid's appeal is without merit, that the dispositive issues have been decided in previous authoritative decisions, and affirms the judgment of the district court which denied Reid relief in the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views1 page

    James H. Reid v. E.C. Morris R.M. Muncy James E. Johnson B.W. Soles C. Manrique, 838 F.2d 467, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by James H. Reid against several defendants. In less than 3 sentences, the court finds that Reid's appeal is without merit, that the dispositive issues have been decided in previous authoritative decisions, and affirms the judgment of the district court which denied Reid relief in the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    838 F.

    2d 467
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    James H. REID, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    E.C. MORRIS; R.M. Muncy; James E. Johnson; B.W. Soles;
    C. Manrique, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 87-6092.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: July 30, 1987.
    Decided: Jan. 19, 1988.

    James H. Reid, pro se.


    Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Office of the Attorney General, for
    appellees.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and
    BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Reid v. Morris, C/A No. 86-152-L (W.D.Va., June 17, 1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like