Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Winston Lloyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against prison officials which was denied by the district court. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without needing to hear oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. 3) The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Lloyd's § 1983 claim.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-10-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 976 F.2d 726 Docket: 92-6453

    Original Title

    Winston Lloyd v. Lloyd L. Waters, Warden Bishop L. Robinson Shawn Jackson Roger D. Vann David M. Healey Richard A. Williams, 976 F.2d 726, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Winston Lloyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against prison officials which was denied by the district court. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without needing to hear oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. 3) The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Lloyd's § 1983 claim.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Winston Lloyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against prison officials which was denied by the district court. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without needing to hear oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. 3) The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Lloyd's § 1983 claim.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    976 F.

    2d 726

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Winston LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Lloyd L. WATERS, Warden; Bishop L. Robinson; Shawn
    Jackson; Roger D. Vann; David M. Healey; Richard
    A. Williams, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 92-6453.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 27, 1992
    Decided: October 7, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-91-2189-B)
    Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
    Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellees.
    D.Md.
    Affirmed.
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION

    Winston Lloyd appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Waters, No. CA-91-2189-B (D. Md.
    Apr. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like