Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Crump v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Marc J. Crump of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court denied Crump a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Crump v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Marc J. Crump of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court denied Crump a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7390

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Marc J. Crump of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court denied Crump a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Crump v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Marc J. Crump of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court denied Crump a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7390

    MARC J. CRUMP,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    CHARLES E. THOMPSON, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
    (CA-95-300-AM)
    Submitted:

    August 5, 1997

    Decided:

    September 3, 1997

    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Marc J. Crump, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. Crump v. Thompson, No. CA-95-300AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like