Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Mark Robinson appealed the denial of his motion for resentencing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7677

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mark Robinson appealed the denial of his motion for resentencing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Robinson appealed the denial of his motion for resentencing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7677

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MARK D. ROBINSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CR-95-176)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2001

    Decided:

    May 3, 2001

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mark D. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Thompkins, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark D. Robinson appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for resentencing.

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    According-

    ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    United

    States v. Robinson, No. CR-95-176 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2000).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like