Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McRae v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Michael W. McRae appealed the district court's dismissal of his employment discrimination action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they denied McRae's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1188

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Michael W. McRae appealed the district court's dismissal of his employment discrimination action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they denied McRae's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    McRae v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Michael W. McRae appealed the district court's dismissal of his employment discrimination action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they denied McRae's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1188

    MICHAEL W. MCRAE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA00-3724-S)

    Submitted:

    June 21, 2001

    Decided:

    June 28, 2001

    Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael W. McRae, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michel W. McRae appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his employment discrimination action.

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
    the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See McRae v.

    Maryland, No. CA-00-3724-S (D. Md. Jan. 3, 2001). We dispense with


    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like