Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Baldwin v. Barnhart, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Tia Baldwin appealed the district court's decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner's denial of her claim for Social Security benefits. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-05-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1500

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tia Baldwin appealed the district court's decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner's denial of her claim for Social Security benefits. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Baldwin v. Barnhart, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tia Baldwin appealed the district court's decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner's denial of her claim for Social Security benefits. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1500

    TIA S. BALDWIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social
    Security,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (CA-03-171-7-FL)

    Submitted:

    April 14, 2006

    Decided:

    May 5, 2006

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Lee Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant.


    Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, R. A. Renfer, Jr., Anne
    M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tia

    S.

    Baldwin

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and


    affirming the Commissioners denial of Social Security benefits.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    Baldwin v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-171-7-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2005).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like