Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Spates v. United Parcel SVC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Spates appealed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service in his civil rights action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its February 8, 1996 decision. The appellate panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Spates v. United Parcel SVC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Larry Spates appealed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service in his civil rights action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its February 8, 1996 decision. The appellate panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-1328

    Original Title

    Spates v. United Parcel Svc, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Spates appealed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service in his civil rights action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its February 8, 1996 decision. The appellate panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Spates v. United Parcel SVC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Spates appealed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service in his civil rights action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its February 8, 1996 decision. The appellate panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-1328

    LARRY SPATES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED PARCEL SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem.
    Richard C. Erwin,
    Senior District Judge. (CA-94-652-6)
    Submitted:

    September 10, 1996

    Decided:

    September 24, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Larry Spates, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Margaret
    Ann Anderson, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting
    summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in his civil rights
    action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Spates v. United Parcel Serv., No.
    CA-94-652-6 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like