Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. McCullough, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Willie McCullough's motion for reduction of sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court granted McCullough's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7444

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Willie McCullough's motion for reduction of sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court granted McCullough's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. McCullough, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Willie McCullough's motion for reduction of sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The court granted McCullough's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7444

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WILLIE MCCULLOUGH,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, District
    Judge. (CR-01-231)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 2004

    Decided:

    December 23, 2004

    Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Willie McCullough, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Willie McCullough appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the
    record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. McCullough,

    No. CR-01-231 (E.D. Va. June 15, 2004).


    request to proceed in forma pauperis.

    We grant McCulloughs
    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like