Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rainey, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Marlin Rainey's "Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment." Rainey appealed the district court's October 2009 denial. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 2009 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8049

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Marlin Rainey's "Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment." Rainey appealed the district court's October 2009 denial. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 2009 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Rainey, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Marlin Rainey's "Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment." Rainey appealed the district court's October 2009 denial. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 2009 order. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8049

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    MARLIN RAINEY,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2010

    Decided:

    March 5, 2010

    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marlin Rainey, Appellant Pro Se.


    Irvin McCreary Allen, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Robert Eric Friedman, Special
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Marlin

    Rainey

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Rainey, No. 1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3 (E.D.

    Va. filed Oct. 21, 2009; entered Oct. 22, 2009).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like