Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Clifton, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Mark Clifton's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Clifton's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-05-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7657

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Mark Clifton's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Clifton's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    16 views2 pages

    United States v. Clifton, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Mark Clifton's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Clifton's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7657

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MARK CLIFTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (7:96-cr-00062-H-2)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2011

    Decided:

    May 31, 2011

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark Clifton, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark

    Clifton

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying Clifton a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c)

    (2006).

    reversible error.

    We

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    00062-H-2

    have

    (E.D.N.C.

    United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr-

    Nov.

    9,

    2010).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like