Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vick v. Foote, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Nan S. Vick and Foote, Incorporated. The district court denied relief on Vick's civil complaint against Foote, Inc. and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2486

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Nan S. Vick and Foote, Incorporated. The district court denied relief on Vick's civil complaint against Foote, Inc. and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Vick v. Foote, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Nan S. Vick and Foote, Incorporated. The district court denied relief on Vick's civil complaint against Foote, Inc. and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2486

    NAN S. VICK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FOOTE, INCORPORATED, t/a Foote Tire,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-95-151)
    Submitted:

    November 30, 1995

    Decided:

    April 12, 1996

    Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit


    Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nan S. Vick, Appellant Pro Se.
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Robert Patrick Geary, Richmond,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vick v. Foote,
    Inc., No. CA-95-151 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like