Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lloyd, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Errol Lloyd's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning or decision. It therefore denied Lloyd a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinions, which found no grounds to grant Lloyd's § 2255 motion or motion for reconsideration.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-06-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6495

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Errol Lloyd's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning or decision. It therefore denied Lloyd a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinions, which found no grounds to grant Lloyd's § 2255 motion or motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Lloyd, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Errol Lloyd's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning or decision. It therefore denied Lloyd a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinions, which found no grounds to grant Lloyd's § 2255 motion or motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6495

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ERROL ANTHONY LLOYD, a/k/a Teech,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-96-463-A, CA-00-1176-AM)

    Submitted:

    May 30, 2002

    Decided:

    June 7, 2002

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Errol Anthony Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Errol Anthony Lloyd seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West
    Supp. 2001) and his motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinions and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    United

    States v. Lloyd, Nos. CR-96-463-A; CA-00-1176-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 4,


    2002; filed Feb. 11, 2002 & entered Feb. 12, 2002).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like