Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Darryl L. Wright v. David Waterway Coker, 60 F.3d 827, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Darryl Wright filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against David Coker that was dismissed by the district court. Wright appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court and magistrate judge that Wright's complaint did not state a valid claim. The Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of the district court's dismissal without requiring oral arguments, as the relevant facts and laws were clear based on the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Darryl L. Wright v. David Waterway Coker, 60 F.3d 827, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views1 page
    Darryl Wright filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against David Coker that was dismissed by the district court. Wright appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court and magistrate judge that Wright's complaint did not state a valid claim. The Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of the district court's dismissal without requiring oral arguments, as the relevant facts and laws were clear based on the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-07-10 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 60 F.3d 827 Docket: 94-7129

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Darryl Wright filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against David Coker that was dismissed by the district court. Wright appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court and magistrate judge that Wright's complaint did not state a valid claim. The Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of the district court's dismissal without requiring oral arguments, as the relevant facts and laws were clear based on the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    16 views1 page

    Darryl L. Wright v. David Waterway Coker, 60 F.3d 827, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Darryl Wright filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against David Coker that was dismissed by the district court. Wright appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court and magistrate judge that Wright's complaint did not state a valid claim. The Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of the district court's dismissal without requiring oral arguments, as the relevant facts and laws were clear based on the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    60 F.

    3d 827
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Darryl L. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    David Waterway COKER, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 94-7129.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 22, 1995.
    Decided July 10, 1995.

    Darryl L. Wright, Appellant Pro Se.


    D.S.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Wright v. Coker, No. CA-94-2323 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 1994). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like